|
NOTE:
|
IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF THE ARIZONA REVISED
STATUTES AND THE FLAGSTAFF CITY CHARTER THE SUMMARIZED MINUTES OF CITY
FLOODPLAIN BOARD MEETINGS ARE NOT VERBATIM TRANSCRIPTS. ONLY THE ACTIONS
TAKEN AND DISCUSSION APPEARING WITH QUOTATION MARKS ARE VERBATIM. AUDIO
RECORDINGS OF FLOODPLAIN BOARD MEETINGS ARE ON FILE IN THE CITY CLERK’S
OFFICE.
|
|
SUMMARIZED MINUTES
SPECIAL FLOODPLAIN BOARD
MEETING
September 15, 2009
5:30 p.m.
|
|
A Special Meeting of the
Flagstaff Floodplain Board was held on September 15, 2009, convening at 10:18
p.m., in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 211 West Aspen Avenue, Flagstaff, Arizona.
|
|
CALL TO ORDER
The Meeting was called to order
by Mayor Presler.
|
|
2. ROLL CALL
On roll call, the following
were present:
|
|
|
Mayor Presler
Vice-Mayor White
Councilmember Brewster
Councilmember Evans
Councilmember Haughey
Councilmember Overton
Councilmember Swanson -
Excused
|
|
|
Also present were:
|
|
|
City Manager, Kevin Burke
City Attorney, Patricia
Boomsma
|
|
3.
|
Consideration of Public Hearing: Request for Variance to Floodplain Regulations, City Code Section
12-01-001-0006.7, for property located at 6900 E. Old Walnut Canyon Road, Flagstaff.
|
|
|
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
|
Open the public hearing.
Receive citizen input.
Close the public hearing.
The Water Commission recommends denial of the variance.
|
|
|
Vice Mayor White moved to open the public hearing. The motion was
seconded by Councilmember Brewster and passed on unanimous vote.
|
|
|
Tom Hieb, Stormwater Project Manager, informed the Council that Lon
Franklin, the owner of the property, has proposed to expand an existing
storage facility into the floodway on his adjacent parcel. A variance is
needed for the portion of the property within the 100-year Rio Floodplain.
The proposed site is currently zoned RR-E (rural residential existing). The
property would have to be rezoned to light industrial to allow the use under
a variance. Mr. Franklin doesn’t want to go to the expense of rezoning the
property to light industrial unless he gets the variance first. If this
doesn’t happen, he would initiate the conditional letter of map revision
process.
|
|
Mayor Presler moved to recess into executive session, seconded by
Councilmember Evans. The motion passed on majority vote with Mayor Presler
and Councilmembers Brewster, Evans, Haughey and Overton in favor, and Vice
Mayor White opposed.
|
|
The meeting reconvened at 10:35 p.m.
|
|
Mr. Hieb presented an aerial photograph of the 25-year flood that
occurred in 1993 showing the entire area, including the existing operation
and adjacent properties, under water. The area where the expansion is
proposed is in a floodway, and there is no floodplain area. A floodway is
the path of the flow of the water. A floodplain is where the water spreads
out and pools and where there is no current. Nothing can be built in a
floodway. The expansion area when flooded is covered by moving water with a
current. Because there is no pooling of water on the proposed site, it is
all designated as a floodway and has been since 1983. Floodplain regulations
don’t preclude the applicant from using the property; however, for the areas
below the 100-year floodwater elevation, a variance would be required.
|
|
A pad could be built up so it is no longer in the floodplain, but that
would create the need to dig deeper in another location to accommodate the
displacement of the existing waters. The applicant could go through that
process with FEMA, but has chosen not to.
|
|
Staff recommends denying the request for a variance as granting a
variance without adequate justification could result in disciplinary action
by FEMA, which could negatively impact the City and its residents. The Water
Commission and the FEMA representative for Flagstaff recommended denying the
request.
|
|
Lon Franklin, the applicant, first received a variance to build the
original yard in 1995 and then received a second variance in 2005 to expand.
He didn’t understand why a third variance on similar type of land is being
recommended for denial. He disagrees with staff’s contention that in 1995
the ordinance was misinterpreted, which allowed him to obtain the prior
variances. Mr. Franklin asserted that the FEMA representative was not
opposed to a variance, but could not take that as a public stand.
|
|
Malcolm Alter, Stormwater Manager, noted that the property does not
have any unique physical characteristics that would create the exceptional
hardship required for a variance. The use of only part of the property, or
the requirement to develop the property as required by the Floodplain
Regulations, also does not impose an exceptional hardship. The property not
in the floodway can be developed and used as proposed in a way that fully
complies with Floodplain Regulations. It will likely be more expensive to
the applicant than the current proposal; however, economic or financial
hardship is not a valid reason for granting a
|
|
variance. The Stormwater Regulations quoted by Mr. Franklin applies
to floodplains and not to floodways. His expansion is in the floodway.
Parking lots are acceptable in a flood fringe, but not in a floodway.
Moreover, FEMA interprets the regulations the same way that staff does, and
there has been no communication to the contrary.
|
|
Mayor Presler moved to postpone the item for 30 days in order to give
legal staff time to prepare for and give Council legal advice in an executive
session. The motion was seconded by Councilmember Overton and passed on
unanimous vote.
|
|
4. ADJOURNMENT
|
|
There being no further business
to come before the Board, the Special Floodplain Board Meeting was adjourned
at 11:28 p.m.
|
|
|
MAYOR
|
|
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
|
|
|
CERTIFICATION
|
|
STATE OF ARIZONA,
Coconino County.
|
)
)
)
|
ss.
|
|
I, MARGIE BROWN, do hereby
certify that I am the City Clerk of the City of Flagstaff, County of Coconino, State of Arizona, and that the above Minutes are a true and correct summary
of the Special Floodplain Board Meeting of the City of Flagstaff held on
September 15, 2009. I further certify that the Special Floodplain Board
Meeting was duly called and held and that a quorum was present.
DATED this 21st day of October,
2009.
|
|
|
CITY CLERK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|